----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65127/#review195510 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/checks/checker_process.cpp Lines 990-1004 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65127/#comment274703> I just found this blog post: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/virtualization/2017/12/19/tar-and-curl-come-to-windows/ It claims that the nanoserver image is only about 200 Mb big and includes `curl`. Can't we use that instead of powershell inside a huge container? - Gaston Kleiman On Jan. 16, 2018, 8:41 a.m., Akash Gupta wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65127/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 16, 2018, 8:41 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Andrew Schwartzmeyer. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > The network health checks called curl and then executed setns to > enter to container network namespace, which did not work on Windows. > To do the equivalent, Windows nows calls docker run with powershell's > curl equivalent (Invoke-WebRequest) and uses the > network=container:<ID> flag to enter the container's namespace. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/checks/checker_process.hpp 510f3b2e6e689faaf26595214ce377c2b5518f28 > src/checks/checker_process.cpp ddb197b8cc2c503fef5ae20af32f5881fff9833f > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65127/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Akash Gupta > >
