-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65759/#review198168
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/docker/executor.cpp
Lines 25 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/65759/#comment278280>

    Is this necessary?



src/docker/executor.cpp
Lines 220 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/65759/#comment278275>

    s/docker/Docker/
    s/retry/retry the/



src/docker/executor.cpp
Lines 221 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/65759/#comment278276>

    s/inspect_loop/inspectLoop/



src/docker/executor.cpp
Lines 233-236 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/65759/#comment278281>

    Suggestion:
    
    "We need to clean up the hanging Docker CLI process. Discarding the 
`inspect` future triggers a callback in the Docker library that kills the 
subprocess and transitions the future."


- Greg Mann


On Feb. 22, 2018, 8:32 p.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65759/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 22, 2018, 8:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Gilbert Song, Greg Mann, and 
> Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8574
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8574
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds retries for `inspect` command to workaround docker
> daemon hangs. We assume that the docker daemon can be temporarily
> unresponsive. If it's unresponsive, then any started docker cli
> command hangs. To address the issue, we retry `inspect` in the loop.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/docker/executor.cpp 80e2d81169f0d4303ca1ddbcef9fa87fe52601fc 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65759/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> internal CI
> 
> Manually, described in /r/65713
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Budnik
> 
>

Reply via email to