-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70200/#review213754
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Gastón Kleiman


On March 15, 2019, 3:35 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70200/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 15, 2019, 3:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Benjamin Mahler, Chun-Hung Hsiao, 
> Gastón Kleiman, James DeFelice, Megha Sharma, and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9648
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9648
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch updates the v1 scheduler API's RECONCILE_OPERATIONS
> call to provide a 202 Accepted response with an empty body,
> rather than a response containing all reconciliation results.
> In this new scheme, reconciliation requests are satisfied with
> operation status updates on the scheduler's event stream.
> Related tests are also updated.
> 
> NOTE that this is a breaking change for schedulers consuming
> the experimental operation reconciliation API.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto 
> 5443048a620395c6beb0d93a325187df905b1b0b 
>   include/mesos/v1/scheduler/scheduler.proto 
> 3cfe0251847431da09a4eb9c81aecb77c84100dc 
>   src/master/http.cpp d6d47405f871f88235cc203ef5cf9f1460754e0c 
>   src/master/master.hpp 953cc5b8ab6a8e1920a3ad63fb2dd6382e3603ec 
>   src/master/master.cpp dc68fc324de7242737123015fbac19a2129778ce 
>   src/tests/operation_reconciliation_tests.cpp 
> 6a815ad694e2a608ce324715c920833f825793a0 
>   src/tests/storage_local_resource_provider_tests.cpp 
> 7945384867f26fa15dc734a235ae509d5d6d350f 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70200/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to