On 14. May 2025, at 16:23, Paul Duffy (paduffy) <[email protected]> wrote: > > It was required that both the OpenAPI and Protobuf definitions be inlined > within the draft. It's a mess (not directly usable by developer tools …
That is indeed a problem. I made a quick prototype a while ago how the RPC might want to expose the source code elements of each RFC for more direct use. Please have a look at https://tzi.de/~cabo/rfc … and, for I-Ds that were current end of 2023, https://tzi.de/~cabo/i-d Unfortunately, the 2023 version there doesn’t have the inlined components yet: https://tzi.de/~cabo/i-d/draft-duffy-csmp-05/ But maybe compare: https://user.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~cabo/i-d/draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-06/ … and particularly, in there https://user.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~cabo/i-d/draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-06/abnf/ I need to run my rough script again... Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
