Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14. May 2025, at 16:23, Paul Duffy (paduffy) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It was required that both the OpenAPI and Protobuf definitions be inlined within the draft. It's a mess (not directly usable by developer tools …
> That is indeed a problem.
> I made a quick prototype a while ago how the RPC might want to expose
> the source code elements of each RFC for more direct use.
I didn't understand the goals here at first.
So this is RFC as "file system", and "i-d" gateway is the file system driver
that exposes the files as resources.
I like this as an idea.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
