Hi Michael,
On 5/15/25 5:08 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Thank you for the RFC8743 reference.
I see that the definitions are in an appendix, which I guess is normative.
Rich said that we should be calling it OpenAPI, because Swagger is the
toolchain, not the format, yet this document says:
The documentation of APIs is provided in the OpenAPI format, using
Swagger v2.0. See Appendix D.
...
{
"swagger": "2.0",
I also see that you used the JSON format for the OpenAPI, and the NIPC
document says:
[JM] Well, *I* didn't use JSON, the authors did ;-)
<CODE BEGINS> file "openapi.yml"
openapi: 3.0.3
info:
so I guess that transition is now done.
In that document, I don't see anything in the References that refers to the
specification. This is really the core of my question.
[JM] I noticed that as I pulled up this example (and I was the primary
editor for this doc <grumble>). Now the RPC has a citation specialist,
and I'll have him chime in.
Thanks!
Jean
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
