On Thu, Jul 10, 2025, at 00:40, Jean Mahoney wrote: > [JM] For this experimental intake process, an author can update the > document, and these updates won't cause a conflict with the document in > the queue because the RPC will wait for a response from the author > before editing the document. (The doc is first placed into EDIT state > only so the RPC can collect SLA stats.)
That seems to be an argument for a new state, or even two. Because the general case of AUTH transitions allows for the document to have been edited by the RPC. (Not arguing for complexity necessarily, I just want the change control authority to be clear.) _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
