Hi all,
On 7/9/25 7:57 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025, at 00:40, Jean Mahoney wrote:
[JM] For this experimental intake process, an author can update the
document, and these updates won't cause a conflict with the document in
the queue because the RPC will wait for a response from the author
before editing the document. (The doc is first placed into EDIT state
only so the RPC can collect SLA stats.)
That seems to be an argument for a new state, or even two. Because the general
case of AUTH transitions allows for the document to have been edited by the
RPC. (Not arguing for complexity necessarily, I just want the change control
authority to be clear.)
[JM] The new queue management system is designed to be flexible, and
will provide the RPC the ability to create new state labels. The system
will also allow the RPC to tag action holders. If this experiment goes
well, the RPC could create an "Awaiting Intake Response" state that
would be applied to a document when a form is sent out, and also
identify who has the action for providing a response.
Best regards,
Jean
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
