On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:10 PM, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > D G Teed wrote: >> OK, deprecated. But in usage, I see depreciated in release notes >> everywhere. > > The question is _your_ usage. I'm generally fairly lenient, but with your > repeated misuse I got a little annoyed, and I know there are folk more > pedantic than I.
I never questioned depreciated "before", really. I've seen it in many release notes and bug reports and understood it from context. Like terms I've seen elsewhere: "bleeding edge" and "postmortem", I've never bothered analyzing the literal meaning, because I understand the meaning from context, and that is sufficient for me. If you want to start a crusade to convert all of the references to depreciated into deprecated, then you should start your work upstream. I'm merely a user, and I'm learning the term from usage by developers. --Donald _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
