On 12/10/10 3:36 PM, Collins, Kevin [BEELINE] wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I agree that epoch is not something I want to use. Do you think
> it makes more sense to do "2%{dist}.chevron" or "2%{dist}.chevron.1"?
If there's ever the chance you would rebuild one of Red Hat's RPMs more
than once and wanted upgrades to work, you should use the second form.
This way you can change 2%{dist}.chevron.1 to 2%{dist}.chevron.2 and
upgrades will work.
/Brian/
_______________________________________________
rhelv6-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
