The only reason I would rebuild is if they release an update, in which case I think I would be covered... but I may use the 2nd form anyway, since as soon as I say I'll never need something will come up where I do :)
Thanks, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Long Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 1:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [rhelv6-list] rebuilt package not showing selected for update On 12/10/10 3:36 PM, Collins, Kevin [BEELINE] wrote: > Brian, > > I agree that epoch is not something I want to use. Do you think > it makes more sense to do "2%{dist}.chevron" or "2%{dist}.chevron.1"? If there's ever the chance you would rebuild one of Red Hat's RPMs more than once and wanted upgrades to work, you should use the second form. This way you can change 2%{dist}.chevron.1 to 2%{dist}.chevron.2 and upgrades will work. /Brian/ _______________________________________________ rhelv6-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list _______________________________________________ rhelv6-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
