On 5 May 2016, at 15:11, alexc155 <ahcl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your reply.
> 
> I don't think that write_once is going to work for us as we have to
> periodically update the data (although if we remove the data before
> re-inserting it, would that work?)
> 
> Why does read-before-write slow down new writes so much?

Interesting. What version of riak is this, please?

> 
> Some new information we've found - it seems that if we write the data and
> then update it, we get fast speeds too. It's just the initial write of the
> data that is slow.
> 
> So why is writing sequential keys so much slower than updating them or
> writing non-sequential keys?
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/How-to-increase-Riak-write-performance-for-sequential-alpha-numeric-keys-tp4034219p4034225.html
> Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to