On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:40:38 +0200, Armel Le Bail wrote:
>J"org Bergmann wrote:
>>More for information: BGMN calculates ESDs for bond lengths, bond angles,
>>torsion angles, out-of-plane angles etc. on demand (see GOAL's). For
>>laboratory X ray sources, it has a superiour peak shape function
>>(raytraced plus tube-tails corrected fundamental parameters profiles).
>
>May I have a reference showing clearly that this superiority is
>established, and preferably by an independent group ? Superiority
>to what ? For doing what ?
Hello,
it took some time, but here is the first result of an independent group
(the first I know about):
M. Gossla, H. Metzner, and H.-E. Mahnke
Coevaporation Cu-In films as precursors for solar cells
J. Appl. Phys. 86 (1999) 3624-3632
They give no R values. But, as I feel, both the excellent Rietveld
difference plots and the table comparing RBS vs. XRD Indium wt. %
demonstrate the correctness of the results achieved by the BGMN Rietveld
program (which, at my opinion, result from the correct peak shape function).
J"org Bergmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
