Hi, in our work we still sometimes encounter entirely new compounds with simple 
structures like rocksalt, spinel, etc.  in order to convince ourselves and our 
readers that the materials are real, we have to fit the powder patterns - put 
in the atoms, refine lattice parameter(s), show that thermal parameters are 
reasonable, fit the peak shapes, background etc all together.  In the case of 
spinels for example we can also refine the single atomic parameter and show 
that the bond lengths are reasonable.  The refinements are used to decide 
whether sites are fully occupied and to decide the valence of the cation when 
multiple valence states are possible.  It’s not the kind of thing that would 
get people really excited with the crystallographic methods, but it is 
necessary for convincing ourselves and others that the identification of the 
compound is reasonable.  Is that Rietveld refinement?  I don’t know so I call 
upon the list to say.

Kurt

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr <rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr> on behalf of 
Matthew Rowles <rowle...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2024 11:04:25 PM
To: Alan W Hewat <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Cc: Le Bail Armel <le-bail.ar...@orange.fr>; Rietveld_L <Rietveld_L@ill.fr>
Subject: Re: Misconduct

I see the core contribution of the Rietveld method as the point-wise 
calculation of a powder pattern. This then enables the refinement of the 
parameters.

Yes, attributing QPA to Rietveld is incorrect; that is mainly due to 
Hill/Howard and Bish/Howard - I try to make it a point to differentiate this.

calling PDF refinements Rietveld refinements is just plain wrong (afaik), 
unless you actually are moving crystallographic parameters around, in which 
case, the nomenclature gets fuzzy..

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 14:39, Alan W Hewat 
<alan.he...@neutronoptics.com<mailto:alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>> wrote:
The core of Rietveld refinement is REFINING the crystallographic parameters to 
fit the pattern. That was the great innovation. Is that done here ? To 
calculate various patterns to refine phase composition you necessarily need 
models of the crystal structures. But all refinements of powder patterns are 
not Rietveld Refinement. Quantitative analysis of powder samples is an 
important technique, and to attribute that to Rietveld is wrong. Same goes for 
Pair Distribution Function analysis. Calling everything "Rietveld Refinement" 
is not helpful, and actually hides the fundamental contribution of this 
technique to crystallography.

________________________________
Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics
Grenoble, FRANCE (from phone)
alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
+33.476984168 VAT:FR79499450856
http://NeutronOptics.com/hewat<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://NeutronOptics.com/hewat__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!bR8Hzbc4csqSqmzz4jXPaN2SAqzUu0gu8WOlXtZTOx8piJSkXhgF8JUGaWkbeE_zV8sgBuOnpGnCKA$>
_______________________________


On Sat, 13 Jan 2024, 07:00 Matthew Rowles, 
<rowle...@gmail.com<mailto:rowle...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hard disagree here.

You're using crystallographic parameters to calculate the (intensities and 
positions of the) pattern.

To me, that's the core of Rietveld refinement.

You need to apply a peak shape model. Why not apply a model from which you can 
extract crystallite parameters?

QPA can then be done on the output of a refinement, eg application of the 
internal standard method using the Hill /Howard algorithm.

Its still a Rietveld refinement, I'm not just fitting peaks willy nilly; 
they're constrained by a crystal model.


Matthew

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024, 01:48 Alan W Hewat, 
<alan.he...@neutronoptics.com<mailto:alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>> wrote:
Apart from the record number of atoms, phases, parameters, citations etc used 
to describe just 3 broad peaks, I object to this kind of refinement being 
called "Rietveld refinement". Luca called it "Rietveld-like" in MAUD, which was 
used here, but even that is wrong. The term "Rietveld refinement" should be 
restricted to the refinement of crystallographic parameters - cell dimensions, 
atom coordinates etc. and not applied to quantitative analysis of phases, 
particle size etc. Fitting peaks in powder patterns was done before Rietveld, 
who must be turning in his grave to see his name associated with this kind of 
thing.

________________________________
Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics
Grenoble, FRANCE (from phone)
alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
+33.476984168 VAT:FR79499450856
http://NeutronOptics.com/hewat<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://NeutronOptics.com/hewat__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!bR8Hzbc4csqSqmzz4jXPaN2SAqzUu0gu8WOlXtZTOx8piJSkXhgF8JUGaWkbeE_zV8sgBuOnpGnCKA$>
_______________________________


On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, 12:57 Le Bail Armel, 
<le-bail.ar...@orange.fr<mailto:le-bail.ar...@orange.fr>> wrote:

Hi,

A good candidate for the "worst Rietveld refinement of the year" award :

https://pubpeer.com/publications/12069A6AD9D5D34F26031F34705D06<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://pubpeer.com/publications/12069A6AD9D5D34F26031F34705D06__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!bR8Hzbc4csqSqmzz4jXPaN2SAqzUu0gu8WOlXtZTOx8piJSkXhgF8JUGaWkbeE_zV8sgBuN71xsjjg$>

Even the difference pattern is totally fabricated.

Best

Armel

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr<mailto:lists...@ill.fr>> eg: HELP as the 
subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on 
http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!bR8Hzbc4csqSqmzz4jXPaN2SAqzUu0gu8WOlXtZTOx8piJSkXhgF8JUGaWkbeE_zV8sgBuOVERBLwQ$>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr<mailto:lists...@ill.fr>> eg: HELP as the 
subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on 
http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!bR8Hzbc4csqSqmzz4jXPaN2SAqzUu0gu8WOlXtZTOx8piJSkXhgF8JUGaWkbeE_zV8sgBuOVERBLwQ$>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to