gharris999;427733 Wrote: > The only advantage, as far as I know, is that it appeals to my sense of > tidiness: one file per CD, containing all the audio data, all the > metadata, coverart, etc. With a fairly large collection approaching 1T > in size, there is some slight disc space savings by having fewer files. > > Re-creating the CD from the single flac is dead easy...just a simple > drag and drop of a single file onto Burrrrn. > > I'm fairly certain that there isn't anything that I'm doing with my > tagging that one couldn't accomplish in track-per-flac flacs. > > The main drawbacks to album-per-flacs are: 1) track replay gain is > difficult to calculate and tag and 2) SqueezeServer still transcodes > this format, i.e. it requires an extra process on the server side. > > So...any advantages are probably purely psychological. Sitting here in > the nursing home with my Dad, watching him endlessly sort the same pile > of junk mail over and over, I'm getting a whole new appreciation for > those psychological advantages.
Nothing against you my friend, but I'm so glad I didn't go the cue sheet way. I like the advantages of the individual tracks and the ease of use. -- Nonreality -IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.- HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63614 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
