David Welton wrote:
ap_chdir_file was simply commented out (why?). In fact I noticed
yesterday that
some pages that had nested templates in them were broken.
Printing the output of 'pwd' showed that templates were stuck to the
documentRoot
Keep in mind that there are also Tcl_ functions, but mixing them can
be dangerous.
My test was at the Tcl level in a .rvt file. Do you refer to the
ap_chdir_file call?
In mod_rivet.c there are lots of calls to both ap_ and Tcl_. For what I
can say there is no obvious overlapping in the way mod_rivet uses these
2 libraries. But my opinion should be matched to Valery's opinion.
Yes, you are on the right track. Any OS level stuff should be done
through either the apr_ or the Tcl api's. apr_ and Tcl_ give you a
lot of functionality, so it's often wise to look there prior to doing
something 'by hand'.
Massimo - do you have the time to commit Valery's patches?
yes, I'll do it soon.
-- Massimo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
