> There was some talk of this at the conference, but the general consensus > seemed to be that it was hard and we'd lose history because CVS -> Git > conversion is not perfect enough. To which I replied that it's better than > putting 10 more years of history in CVS. But whatever. I'm not a core team > member, and I couldn't budge that lot even if I were.
The Postgresql guys managed: http://lwn.net/Articles/409635/ Looks like some fairly serious effort thought. -- David N. Welton http://www.welton.it/davidw/ http://www.dedasys.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
