On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 10:00:05 +0100, "Peter D'Hoye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's a shame that your improvements are (apparently) being rejected by >> the core developers. > >That is not true and you know it. The code is there to use for everybody and >the rules are clear (and quite flexible imho). "Rules" - Paul talked about rules too. Can you give me a URL for that? I've searched and can't find anything apart from the forum posting guidelines which don't seem to be applicable here. > >> If your code becomes unwelcome on the rockbox wiki, I have tons >> of web space and would be more than happy to host it. I do >> agree with one comment - you need to indicate revisions with >> at least a minor suffix change. I called it 2.5.1.1 on my machine. > >So this issue can be closed now: >- copy the info from the wiki page into the foruum post >- copy the build + source or dif to the offered webspaces (2 offers already) > >Peter >
