On 10/11/2010 01:47 PM, Paul Louden wrote: > I'd like to propose one additional step - at the time the patch is > posted on flyspray, the person seeking to have it committed sends an > email out to the -dev list. Also, if a patch has been on flyspray for > some time, and has just reached committable status, then they send out > the email to -dev at that time. The week begins based on when the -dev > email is sent, rather than when the patch is posted to flyspray, but > affirmations / objections must be on flyspray (or in one place, but that > seems the most logical to me at this time) so that they don't need to be > collected across multiple sources, and so there's a clear record.
As I said (in the wrong place (#rockbox-community)), this proposed addendum by Llorean achieves what _I_ believe is the crucial component of this overall proposal, that requested changes to behavior be backed by supportive structural changes. --soap
