rohc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Rohc] [Question #232430]: Question about IR/IR-DYN remainder header? Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #232430]: Question about IR/IR-DYN remainder header? tony
• [Rohc] android compilation X-Calibre
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation X-Calibre
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation X-Calibre
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation X-Calibre
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation X-Calibre
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation X-Calibre
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation X-Calibre
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] android compilation Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #232097]: TCP regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #232097]: TCP regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #232097]: TCP regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #232097]: TCP Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #232097]: TCP regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #232097]: TCP Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #232097]: TCP regulararmy
• [Rohc] TCP profile merged in main dev branch Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] TCP profile merged in main dev branch Cédric Baudoin
• [Rohc] account creation disabled on wiki Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #231360]: rohc implementation for wimax manish shivare
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231360]: rohc implementation for wimax Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231360]: rohc implementation for wimax Launchpad Janitor
• [Rohc] [Question #231359]: rohc integration in ns2 manish shivare
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231359]: rohc integration in ns2 Launchpad Janitor
• [Rohc] [Question #231316]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231316]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231316]: about feedback Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231316]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231316]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231316]: about feedback Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231316]: about feedback regulararmy
• [Rohc] [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server said lokhat
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server said lokhat
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server said lokhat
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #231116]: no ping with remote server robert kessler
• [Rohc] [Question #230938]: size smaller regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230938]: size smaller regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230938]: size smaller Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230938]: size smaller regulararmy
• [Rohc] [Question #230685]: is it a bug? regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230685]: is it a bug? regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230685]: is it a bug? Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230685]: is it a bug? regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230685]: is it a bug? Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230685]: is it a bug? regulararmy
• [Rohc] Major version 1.6.0 is available! Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] Major version 1.6.0 is available! Audric Schiltknecht
  • Re: [Rohc] Major version 1.6.0 is available! Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] Maintenance versions 1.3.5, 1.4.3, and 1.5.2 are available! Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #212269]: Status of bug #1071413 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #216331]: Status of bug #1096586 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #180689]: Status of bug #813128 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #165269]: Status of bug #813128 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #228535]: Status of bug #1178441 changed to 'Fix Released' in trunk Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #230409]: Return Value regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230409]: Return Value Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230409]: Return Value regulararmy
• [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230301]: cid_type regulararmy
• [Rohc] [Question #230218]: compressed header size Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230218]: compressed header size Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230218]: compressed header size Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230218]: compressed header size Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230218]: compressed header size Friedrich
• [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #230140]: some questions regulararmy
• [Rohc] What is the best practice for RTP packet send with rohc? Yuming Zheng
  • Re: [Rohc] What is the best practice for RTP packet send with rohc? Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] tun2udp 宋鑫
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp 宋鑫
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp 宋鑫
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp 宋鑫
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp 宋鑫
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp 宋鑫
  • Re: [Rohc] tun2udp Didier Barvaux
• Re: [Rohc] [Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar? Atik
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar? Atik
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar? Audric Schiltknecht
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar? Gregory G
• [Rohc] [Question #229904]: how to download rohc branch with bazzaar? Gregory G
• [Rohc] [Question #229838]: profile0x0000 regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229838]: profile0x0000 Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229838]: profile0x0000 regulararmy
• [Rohc] [Question #229518]: about feedback (2) Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229518]: about feedback (2) Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229518]: about feedback (2) Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229518]: about feedback (2) Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229518]: about feedback (2) Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229518]: about feedback (2) Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229518]: about feedback (2) Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229518]: about feedback (2) Friedrich
• [Rohc] [Question #229506]: RTP in 1.5.2 Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229506]: RTP in 1.5.2 Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229506]: RTP in 1.5.2 Friedrich
• Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback Friedrich
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229448]: about feedback regulararmy
• [Rohc] [Question #229419]: What protocol number should be for RTP header compression Wei Wang
• [Rohc] [Question #229409]: How to know flow of packet after be compressed nguyen trong cuong
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229409]: How to know flow of packet after be compressed Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229409]: How to know flow of packet after be compressed Atik
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229409]: How to know flow of packet after be compressed Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] Window size in W-LSB encoding faraz iqbal
  • Re: [Rohc] Window size in W-LSB encoding Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #229367]: three parameters regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229367]: three parameters Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229367]: three parameters regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229367]: three parameters regulararmy
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229367]: three parameters Didier Barvaux
  • Re: [Rohc] [Question #229367]: three parameters regulararmy
• [Rohc] [Question #216331]: Status of bug #1096586 changed to 'Fix Released' in 1.5.x Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #228535]: Status of bug #1178441 changed to 'Fix Released' in 1.5.x Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #228952]: Status of bug #1180480 changed to 'Fix Committed' in rohc Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #228952]: Status of bug #1180480 changed to 'Fix Committed' in iprohc Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #228952]: Status of bug #1180480 changed to 'Confirmed' in iprohc Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #228952]: Status of bug #1180480 changed to 'Incomplete' in iprohc Didier Barvaux
• [Rohc] [Question #228952]: I can reliably crash iprohc client matthew

• Earlier messages
• Later messages