+1 on ditching it. we can definitely find something better.
-- Allen
Lance Lavandowska wrote:
Kill the jazzy spell-checker. I've never been terribly happy with it
myself, and I integrated it. I had a horrible time trying to build an
interface without relying on javascript (something I am loath to do),
and I never could figure out how to get it to ignore html tags.
Lance
On 4/17/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I've used it a couple times, using Google or OS X's dictionary
is usually a lot faster. I'd love to use a spell checker like GMail
or Zimbra have - those are pretty slick.
Matt
On 4/17/06, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When implementing entry summary/content, I left the spell-checker in
place, but only for entry text/content as before. I didn't do the
extra work to enable spell-checking of entry summary. I must admit.
I've never been really happy with the spell-checker and I wonder:
Does anybody actually use the Roller spell-checker?
There are some problems with it:
- The dictionary is tiny
- The Jazzy component is LGPL licensed
- The user interface is unpleasant
- All HTML elements are marked as misspellings
Personally, I'd like to drop it entirely and (at an unspecified
future time) seek an alternative.
Any thoughts on the spell checker?
Any suggestions for an alternative?
- Dave
