Nice for replacing the UI. The actual spell checker seems to handle HTML better too. I haven't looked since I did the Jazzy integration, are there good Java->aspell libraries?
Maybe we could break it out as a seperate module or plugin or whatever so lame-o's like me who deploy to Windows could ignore it? On 4/17/06, Elias Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about this one? > > http://www.broken-notebook.com/spell_checker/index.php > > I believe it's BSD License. The only thing I believe is that it depends > on aspell (a Linux binary), but maybe that can be replaced. All we > really need is the UI code, don't we have the rest? > > -Elias > > Allen Gilliland wrote: > > +1 on ditching it. we can definitely find something better. > > > > -- Allen > > > > > > Lance Lavandowska wrote: > >> Kill the jazzy spell-checker. I've never been terribly happy with it > >> myself, and I integrated it. I had a horrible time trying to build an > >> interface without relying on javascript (something I am loath to do), > >> and I never could figure out how to get it to ignore html tags. > >> > >> Lance > >> > >> On 4/17/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> While I've used it a couple times, using Google or OS X's dictionary > >>> is usually a lot faster. I'd love to use a spell checker like GMail > >>> or Zimbra have - those are pretty slick. > >>> > >>> Matt > >>> > >>> On 4/17/06, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> When implementing entry summary/content, I left the spell-checker in > >>>> place, but only for entry text/content as before. I didn't do the > >>>> extra work to enable spell-checking of entry summary. I must admit. > >>>> I've never been really happy with the spell-checker and I wonder: > >>>> > >>>> Does anybody actually use the Roller spell-checker? > >>>> > >>>> There are some problems with it: > >>>> - The dictionary is tiny > >>>> - The Jazzy component is LGPL licensed > >>>> - The user interface is unpleasant > >>>> - All HTML elements are marked as misspellings > >>>> > >>>> Personally, I'd like to drop it entirely and (at an unspecified > >>>> future time) seek an alternative. > >>>> > >>>> Any thoughts on the spell checker? > >>>> Any suggestions for an alternative? > >>>> > >>>> - Dave > >>>> > >>>> > > >
