How about this one? http://www.broken-notebook.com/spell_checker/index.php
I believe it's BSD License. The only thing I believe is that it depends on aspell (a Linux binary), but maybe that can be replaced. All we really need is the UI code, don't we have the rest? -Elias Allen Gilliland wrote: > +1 on ditching it. we can definitely find something better. > > -- Allen > > > Lance Lavandowska wrote: >> Kill the jazzy spell-checker. I've never been terribly happy with it >> myself, and I integrated it. I had a horrible time trying to build an >> interface without relying on javascript (something I am loath to do), >> and I never could figure out how to get it to ignore html tags. >> >> Lance >> >> On 4/17/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> While I've used it a couple times, using Google or OS X's dictionary >>> is usually a lot faster. I'd love to use a spell checker like GMail >>> or Zimbra have - those are pretty slick. >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> On 4/17/06, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> When implementing entry summary/content, I left the spell-checker in >>>> place, but only for entry text/content as before. I didn't do the >>>> extra work to enable spell-checking of entry summary. I must admit. >>>> I've never been really happy with the spell-checker and I wonder: >>>> >>>> Does anybody actually use the Roller spell-checker? >>>> >>>> There are some problems with it: >>>> - The dictionary is tiny >>>> - The Jazzy component is LGPL licensed >>>> - The user interface is unpleasant >>>> - All HTML elements are marked as misspellings >>>> >>>> Personally, I'd like to drop it entirely and (at an unspecified >>>> future time) seek an alternative. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts on the spell checker? >>>> Any suggestions for an alternative? >>>> >>>> - Dave >>>> >>>> >
