I'm definitely going to continue blogging at rollerweblogger.org and maintaining some sort of blog-technology related wiki there, even if all Apache Roller content is moved to apache.org.
My feeling is that, until we can duplicate the existing setup (Roller + JSPWiki) somewhere on apache.org, we should have 1) a static site at roller.apache.org and 2) continue to host the project blog/wiki at rollerweblogger.org. Is that (hopefully temporary) scenerio going to be problematic? - Dave On 6/7/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Allen Gilliland wrote: > >> I think it's worthwhile to wonder what exactly we need/expect >> to publish on an official ASF site > > For $TLP.apache.org, we expect static text that can be maintained (for now) > in source control, and can be mirrored to multiple servers. > >> http://tomcat.apache.org/ > >> it appears to me that they probably accomplish everything on that site >> using plain old static html. > > Exactly. But see http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/. Were there similar zones > for Tomcat, Jetspeed, Roller, et al, I might expect to find their services > being displayed. > >> i don't see any reason why the Roller project page shouldn't follow >> that same basic convention and stick with static content to server >> up the official ASF project page for Roller. > > +1 > >> it seems better to me if we just leave rollerweblogger.org alone > > Or move it to roller.zones.apache.org. At some point, we might even like to > use Roller to publish official ASF blogs, e.g., project announcements, press > releases, etc. --- I do want to differentiate that from personal blogs, > since we have established that such won't be happening on ASF > infrastructure. It definitely makes sense to setup something like roller.zones.apache.org if we really are going to get other people using it, but EOLing a domain is so hard that I don't see the benefit to try and move everything off of rollerweblogger.org. At the very least I assume dave will still want to keep the blogs currently there in tact. Is there a reason we couldn't use blogs.apache.org if we were actually going to user Roller as the ASF blogging site? -- Allen > > --- Noel >
