Did you get it all figured out? Either/or ways you've thought of will work, theres ton's of ways to do this, and I'm pretty sure that my way probably isn't even the best either, but Its what I use, and It seems to work right. If you still hav problems, just give a holler.
Josh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:52 PM Subject: Re:Delayed Responce in Progs > This is how I would prefer to do it(first post by Josh, I'm new > to the list and am not certain this will be posted where I hope it will > be), but I didn't quite follow the part about copying the code of the > prog. If I'm correct, I would just create a new structure to hold this > copy of the code in. Code previous to the delay must be, or at least > should be, parsed out/changed so it will execute correctly when the > remainder of the code is executed. > Then, I would have to add something to trigger this new, > modified code when the delay time has expired (I don't have events). > Another question that stems from this conversation, is how would > you suggest setting the actual delay time, by using the mprog_delay > variable of the char_data structure? Or would do you suggest a new > variable? If the first option is used, I make the conclusion (though > I'm not 100% certain of it), that the regular type of delay trigger is > moot. > > Thanks for your help. > > Boh-Ahz >
