|
I might be a bit of a n00b but at this stage, I also support this restructuring of the tree. I also see a potential for optimizing builds to allow for building a set of components, as opposed to having to work out what components go with what and build them all individually. Might also help as there are loads of branches in the repository, many that haven't been updated in years, that can be easily reduced in size and/or merged as a result of the scheme. That's just my thoughts on it, but I'm not really had more than about 3-4+ months experience with the ReactOS codebase. On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:46:07 +1000, Ged Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: The logical layout is exactly what is wrong with the tree. The tree is currently laid out in a manner which you would expect someone who doesn't understand NT architecture. Things are laid out by type instead of by architecture. -- Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime. Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish. |
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
