You do know that there were actually 2 sides to that story?
On 01/18/2012 07:18 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 16:06, schrieb Aleksey Bragin:
P.S. Proper answer from Linux team would be "We accept patches!" :-).
Maybe that doesn't match reality. I remember reading an article by
some guy who wrote lots of patches for the scheduler and finally
rewrote the whole thing.
It proved to perform better than the original scheduler and many
people were using it, yet it never got incorporated into the mainline
kernel.
At some point some other guy rewrote the original scheduler doing
basically the same thing that he had developed earlier and at that
point he quit linux development.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev