John Siracusa wrote:
> On 6/19/07, mla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The features I'm interested in are:
>>
>>    o Providing a somewhat consistent interface between these ad-hoc
>>      result sets and normal RDBO objects.
>>
>>    o Catching field typos which the accessors/mutators would give you.
>>      (although you could do the same by locking the hash refs from
>>      DBI, obviously).
>>
>>    o Inflating columns. Mainly datestamps/timestamps, but those come
>>      up a lot. It would use the $sth->{TYPE} info to provide default
>>      inflation logic.
>>
>> I don't care about being able to "save" these objects or it having any
>> knowledge of foreign relationships.
>>
>> Is there any support for this currently with RDBO?
> 
> Nope, but I plan to eventually implement everything you've listed.  It
> just may take a while :)

Cool. Can I help? Do you already have a general approach in mind?

Maurice

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to