John Siracusa wrote: > On 6/19/07 9:59 PM, mla wrote: >> Cool. Can I help? Do you already have a general approach in mind? > > The first step is to make a decent SQL abstract abstraction made up of > mutable objects which link back to the relevant bits of RDBO metadata. I'll > probably validate that piece by re-implementing the existing Manger methods > using the new SQL abstraction.
Could you expand a bit on that first sentence? What's the purpose of the SQL abstraction? I wouldn't mind using SQL and then just telling RDBO how to map the result set columns to RDBO types. Maurice ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
