On 6/19/07, mla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you expand a bit on that first sentence? What's the purpose of the > SQL abstraction?
It's to provide a structured, mutable representation of SQL, rather than trying to deal with it as a big, opaque string. > I wouldn't mind using SQL and then just telling RDBO how to map the > result set columns to RDBO types. If you'd like to whip something up like that, I'd be glad to consider it for inclusion in RDBO (or, failing that, you could release it to CPAN as a separate Rose::DBx::* module). -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
