On Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:18, Luis Garrido wrote: > I thought I was clear in my suggestions but, sure, find here a mock-up of > them. > > http://www.picturetrunk.com/uploads/8f2842da2c.png
I agree with a narrower layout. I don't like the white text on black backgroud. I prefer the tabbed solution proposed by Martin Shepherd. > The Instrument and Bank checkboxes could be substituted for a [none] > option in the respective combo boxes. Strongly agree here. > If you like it and this panel is described in a Qt designer .ui file, > please point it to me and I'll be glad of modifying it to reflect my > concept (well, I wouldn't say it's MY concept, you can see from miles > away where does this come from.) If it is generated algorithmically I > think I will remain on the cheap side, sorry. Rosegarden doesn't use .ui files, except for the transport dialog. Don't ask me why. The UI is built by hand-written code. There is a base class RosegardenParameterBox in gui/widgets.* http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/rosegarden/trunk/rosegarden/gui/widgets.h?view=markup The Instrument Parameter Box is defined in gui/instrumentparameterbox.* http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/rosegarden/trunk/rosegarden/gui/instrumentparameterbox.cpp?view=markup The Segment Parameter Box is defined in gui/segmentparameterbox.* http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/rosegarden/trunk/rosegarden/gui/segmentparameterbox.cpp?view=markup The new Track Parameter Box will be defined in gui/trackparameterbox.* The IPB is used in the Main Window, and also in the Matrix Windows: http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/rosegarden/trunk/rosegarden/gui/rosegardengui.cpp?view=markup http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/rosegarden/trunk/rosegarden/gui/matrixparameterbox.cpp?view=markup Regards, Pedro _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
