On Thursday 02 October 2008, Matthew Woehlke wrote:

> However, a few things have been rather off-putting:
>
> - gmane posting is broken.
> - posts by non-subscribers appear to be moderated forever.

Non-member posts are moderated because 99.99% of them are some of the most 
obnoxious spam imaginable.  It's very rare (once every three months or so) to 
find a real post in there, and most of the time when I do find a real post, 
the poster has already subscribed to the list and tried again.

Gmane isn't supposed to allow posts from people who aren't subscribed to the 
lists, for that matter.

Between inconveniencing approximately one person every three months and 
subjecting everyone who plays by the list rules to all this spam, the choice 
is crystal clear, and all your whining about how difficult participation is 
has done nothing to sway me, and, frankly, quite a lot to convince me that 
I'm wasting my time bothering to talk to you at all.

> - rosegarden is moving away from KDE?

Yes.  We were originally aiming at being something like 90% Qt4, 10% KDE4, but 
in practice we're down to i18n() being the only part of KDE it's going to 
take real effort to work around, and I fully expect we'll switch over to Qt's 
tr() in due course, and wind up with a pure Qt4 application, with no 
dependency on KDE4 at all.

This really isn't as radical as it seems, because KDE has changed 
tremendously, and a great deal of the process of porting involves removing 
KDE code and replacing it with Qt code anyway.  In most of the exception 
cases, we have a choice between a Qt4 API or a KDE4 API that are both 
radically different from KDE3, so if we have to rewrite for one or the other, 
it seems most sensible to rewrite for pure Qt4, in light of the extent to 
which we're already being forced to shift in that direction anyway.

I love KDE, and part of me hates this shift, but I can't argue with how much 
sense it makes from an overview perspective.  When we started this, I was 
extremely reluctant to move away from KDE, to the point where I thought I 
might wind up quitting the project, but now that I have been waist deep in it 
for awhile, I think we can probaby make the whole thing liveable.  We might 
have to go to some trouble to get file dialogs that don't suck, but Sonic 
Visualiser has decent file dialogs, and it's pure Qt4.  MusE and MusE Score 
and Canorus are all pure Qt4.  Lots of other apps in this arena have always 
been pure Qt3, and I'm sure they'll be moving to pure Qt4.

It's really not that bad.  At least we're not switching to GNOME.  If 
Rosegarden ever did that, I'd vomit in my hat, and then shoot someone.

I really don't think removing the dependency on KDE is as much of a deal 
breaker as you think, but either way, you're stuck with it just like I am, 
for better or worse, and since there's nothing quite like Rosegarden 
anywhere, on any platform, at any price, we're all just shit out of luck if 
we can't live with it.

If you want to be pissed off at someone, try being pissed off at Trolltech.  
It works for me.  I'd rather eat a bowl of broken glass than deal with this 
nightmare, but I have no choice unless I want to maintain my own copy of Qt3 
and KDE3 in perpetuity, which probably isn't even an option, because I'm just 
not talented enough to replace two entire teams of developers.
-- 
D. Michael McIntyre 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to