On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:09 AM, D. Michael McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree that working on a Qt only project make me feel somehow dirty too
I have always been perfectly happy to use KDE stuff, and KDE desktop integration has been handy, and I always found it irritating when people complained about Rosegarden depending on KDE, and so on -- but on the other hand I don't actually use KDE any more myself, so it's hardly going to be a pressing concern for me. (Mind you, I didn't use KDE back when we started making Rosegarden a KDE application either: I switched to it because of Rosegarden, and it stuck, for a few years anyway. Who knows, I may go back to it some time.) I'm still perfectly open to the idea of using KDE bits if we need them. I just think that, where there is a straightforward choice between KDE and plain Qt for a component, there's seldom much reason to prefer the KDE version these days. If it turns out we really do want KDE file dialogs or something, we could always make them an option. While I'm pointlessly rambling, I would note the irony of Matthew's original post complaining that we might switch away from KDE, while at the same time saying that he hadn't actually built Rosegarden because of its dependency on KDE. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
