On 2/20/22 6:51 AM, Philip Leishman wrote:
I can confirm this. I have openSUSE too. Luckily I didn't install the
rosegarden package.
I downloaded the package (without install) and I can see all the rc
files would go to /usr/share/rosegarden/rc/
This is surely not a good idea ?
All the translations are there and, well, just about everything.
The .rc files do not belong there. The only reason we treat them
like resources is so that users can customize them. We don't copy them
to ~/.local/share. Consequently, putting them in /usr/share causes
trouble when installing/running other versions.
I'm not sure whether any of the others would cause similar issues.
E.g. the translations are not copied to ~/.local/share. Do the ones in
/usr/share cause trouble like the .rc files?
I believe the history of this is that some distros didn't do the
right thing with our resources. So we put them in the binary and copied
them to ~/.local/share. This eliminated the distros as a variable and
made Rosegarden more reliable. OpenSUSE's approach makes Rosegarden
less reliable.
The rule here is... Any resource directories that do not appear in
~/.local/share/rosegarden after a run of Rosegarden should not appear in
/usr/share/rosegarden. locale and rc are obvious candidates. pixmaps
is a huge waste of space and (assuming they are used) would introduce
bugs if we ever change those. And we need to change those. scripts are
for developers and should not be installed for users. This would be a
great start, but the rest should probably go as well. None of them
really serve a purpose since we copy to ~/.local/share on startup.
One of you folks actually using OpenSUSE should open a bug report
against the Rosegarden package and get this moving in the right
direction. Good luck.
Ted.
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
