Chris, The venue that I had in mind was the totally ad hoc meeting that Zon placed on TG3's agenda. Hopefully by Seattle we'll have seen a first cut of a possible scope statement/problem statement for this work group's efforts. I believe that now, more than ever, this meeting in Seattle is critical.
I agree it cuts across transactions and I believe that this is why this discussion and work effort is taking place here in the WEDi SNIP arena. Rachel Foerster Rachel Foerster & Associates, Ltd. Phone: 847-872-8070 -----Original Message----- From: Christopher J. Feahr, OD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WEDi SNIP 4 (E-mail 3) Cc: Zon Owen Subject: X12 discussion on "routing" issues Rachel, Do you have some specific thoughts on the venue/context for this discussion in Seattle? It seems to cut across all the transaction WGs. Zon: does this fit in your Healthcare Modeling group? -Chris At 10:58 AM 1/24/02 -0600, Rachel Foerster wrote: >suggestion on the Business Issues WG confcall yesterday that I >would like to see the goal for us at the meeting in Seattle to emerge from >that meeting with a clear definition of today's problem(s) plus an initial >outline of the table of contents of the white paper which must be the work >product of our group. > >Rachel Foerster >Rachel Foerster & Associates, Ltd. Christopher J. Feahr, OD http://visiondatastandard.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268
