Martin Stjernholm wrote: >That specific problem is unexpected, but it is an effect of that the >handling of empty containers has been cleaned up (rxml tags no longer >has to cope with RXML.nil or "" interchangeably - they always get "").
>What ideally should have been the case here is that all 5.0 releases >behaved like the current one. Unfortunately the changed RXML.nil >handling wasn't quite correct in the first 5.0 releases. In order to promote sanity and consistency in this respect, might it be a good idea to check bug [5386]? -- Stephen.
