A Lintention de l'administrateur de cette liste de diffusion,
Je vous prie de me retirer de votre liste de diffusion. Je ne ne vois aucune option pour le faire moi-meme. Si je me trompes, instruisez-moi s'il vous plaît. du courage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Vincent Ngundi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <[email protected]>
To: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] AfriNIC Policy Proposal: IPv6 ProviderIndependent(PI) Assignment for End-Sites
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:40:16 +0300
>On Mar 22, 2007, at 4:58 PM, Mark J Elkins wrote:
>
>>McTim - what then are you suggesting? .. to never have PI IPv6 in
>>the
>>AfriNIC region?
>>
>>I believe that some organisations truly need PI IPv6 address space.
>>I don't think its down to us to discuss pricing - but I'd have to
>>agree
>>with you - if the price was high enough
>>only those that really need would apply - as long as its world
>>route-able
(thus filling up routing tables around the world).
>>
>>>From a "Routing Table" point of view - this is one reason why I
>>>liked
>>the idea of providing back-to-back /48 allocations for the likes of
>>IXP's - addresses that would not need to be routed around the
>>world...
>>separate from organisations that really do need world route-able
>>addresses.
>>
>>The folk at AfriNIC can allocate addresses from appropriate blocks
>>according to the needs of the clients
>The new draft doesn't explicitly define the size of the block from
>which the assignments will be made. As Adiel pointed out, these
>decisions are affected by many other factors and as such we should
>leave it to AfriNIC to make that decision.
>
>>- they could even have a two
tier
>>price - low price for world-non-routable, high price for world-
>>routable.
>ditto.
>
>-v
>>
>>In the mean time....
>>a) We still need a PI IPv6 policy though.
>>b) The "routing table" problem will be solved - the AfriNIC
>>negative
>>(as in growth of the table size) contribution will be negligible.
>>
>>
>>
>>JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>>>Nobody is asking to be in panic mode, just to fulfill the AfriNIC
>>>and the
>>>community rules and having a balance in what is really needed and
>>>what is
>>>conservation.
>>>
>>>Making possible for all end-users to apply for this policy may
>>>become a big
>>>waste and not only about addresses and routing
slots, but also a
>>>problem for
>>>AfriNIC to handle contracts, fees and membership of end-users (as
>>>individuals) and many additional implications.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Jordi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>De: Alain Patrick AINA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>Organización: technologies réseaux et Solutions (www.trstech.net)
>>>>Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, AfriNIC Resource Policy
>>>>Discussion List
>>>><[email protected]>
>>>>Fecha: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:12:03 +0000
>>>>Para: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <[email protected]>
>>>>Asunto: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] AfriNIC Policy Proposal: IPv6
>>>>ProviderIndependent
>>>>(PI) Assignment for End-Sites
>>>>
>>>>On Thursday 22 March 2007 11:27:39 McTim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 3/22/07, Alain Patrick AINA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>seems easy to fix between now and abuja :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The other hidden aspect of this discussion is: "are we solving
>>>>>>a problem
>>>>>>for ens-site or for end-user ?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>We are solving a problem for a small number of folk, but
>>>>>creating
>>>>>future problems for all. We can obviate future woes by setting
>>>>>appropriate fees for v6
PI.
>>>>>
>>>>>I recommend this: http://www.vaf.net/~vaf/rrg.pdf for folk who
>>>>>are
>>>>>interested in routing scaling issues.
>>>>>
>>>>Yes. Routing and addressing scalability is an issue and we have
>>>>to look at it,
>>>>but not in panic mode.
>>>>
>>>>IETF-68's yesterday plenary has an interesting discussion on it .
>>>>
>>>>See the routing and addressing problem status report at :
>>>>http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/slides/plenaryw-3.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--alain
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>rpd mailing
list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>**********************************************
>>>The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
>>>
>>>Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
>>>http://www.ipv6day.org
>>>
>>>This electronic message contains information which may be
>>>privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
>>>the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the
>>>intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,
>>>distribution or use of the contents of this information, including
>>> attached files, is
prohibited.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>rpd mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>> . . ___. .__ Posix Systems - Sth Africa
>> /| /| / /__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mark J Elkins, SCO
>>ACE, Cisco CCIE
>>/ |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS Tel: +27 12 807 0590 Cell: +27 82 601
>>0496
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>rpd mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rpd mailing
list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
Partagez des fichiers de toute taille avec Windows Live Messenger1
_______________________________________________ rpd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
