On Monday, 30 June 2008, at 23:06:41 (-0400), Jay Soffian wrote: > I've got a vendor-provided RPM which I am *not* in control of. I have > two other RPMs which I *am* in control of, one needs to go before the > vendor-provided RPM and the other needs to go after it. So: > > - my-pre.rpm > - vendor-provided.rpm > - my-post.rpm > > Obviously, I can add a "Requires: vendor-provided" to my-post.rpm, but > that doesn't help with my-pre.rpm. Which is why I was hoping that just > specifying them to /bin/rpm in the right order would work properly. > Sounds like it should.
Is it possible that what you're trying to accomplish might be better done with %triggers? Or are these strictly file-/content-based dependency ordering issues? More details might help clarify. :) Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Sometimes I give myself the creeps. Sometimes my mind plays tricks on me. It all keeps adding up; I think I'm cracking up. Am I just paranoid? Am I just stoned?" -- Green Day, "Basket Case" ______________________________________________________________________ RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
