On 3/3/11 1:44 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > Hmmm ... I'l try, but I'll bet that both > beecrypt and syck are external in this bug report.
They shouldn't be. The issue is something to do with stricter library link checking on newer systems. I.e. if you simply link to librpmio.so you get a link error, because the symbols for the beecrypt and related used in librpmio.so can't be resolved -- you have to include all of the components on the link line now. > Which is kinda pointless since ... > > afaik: nothing but rpm uses beecrypt, and anything using syck is > better off with libyaml. > > So its m00t whether internal <-> external (and the rpm tarball ships > with both beecrypt/syck inside). (See above, it's internal) > But I WILL try to figger something. > > BTW, mtree is quite useful. Are you distributing in Poky/yacto? > The alternative is of course to just include the *BSD mtree > outside of RPM. It's of course being built with Poky/Yocto -- I think we're also packaging it, but I'm not sure about that. (We more or less follow the same package breakup as the rpm 5.4.0 .spec file... So if it's packaged in there, then we're likely packaging as well.) --Mark > 73 de Jeff > On Mar 3, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > >> The following patch was sent to the oe-core mailing list. This fixes a >> problem >> when RPM5 (5.4.0) is linked on an Ubuntu 11.04-alpha host. >> >> --Mark >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCHv4 6/6] rpm: Fix linking error encountered in >> rpm-native >> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:09:06 -0800 >> From: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> >> Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer >> <openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org> >> To: <openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org> >> >> * This patch passes the correct LDFLAGS to account for >> additional dependencies of librpmio on libbeecrypt and libsyck >> and hence fixes the build error. >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> >> --- >> .../rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch | 24 >> ++++++++++++++++++++ >> meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb | 3 +- >> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 >> meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch >> b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..9e7bba0 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch >> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ >> +Source: None >> +Status: Needs to go Upstream >> +Author: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> >> +Date: 2011-03-03 >> +Description: >> +This patch fixes build issue found when compiling rpm-natibe on ubuntu >> +11.04-alpha. Problem is that linker does not get correct set of dependent >> +libraries when linking mtree binary which results in undefined symbols >> +in librpmio.so. This patch adds correct flags to mtree_LDADD to account >> +for rpmio deps >> + >> +Index: rpm-5.4.0/tools/Makefile.am >> +=================================================================== >> +--- rpm-5.4.0.orig/tools/Makefile.am >> ++++ rpm-5.4.0/tools/Makefile.am >> +@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ grep_LDADD = $(RPMIO_LDADD_COMMON) >> + >> + mtree_SOURCES = rpmmtree.c >> + mtree_LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS_STATIC@ $(LDFLAGS) >> +-mtree_LDADD = $(RPM_LDADD_COMMON) >> ++mtree_LDADD = $(RPMIO_LDADD_COMMON) >> + >> + rpmrepo_SOURCES = rpmrepo.c >> + rpmrepo_CPPFLAGS = $(AM_CPPFLAGS) -I$(top_srcdir)/scripts >> -I$(top_builddir)/scripts $(CPPFLAGS) >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb >> b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb >> index 0003f48..3704816 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb >> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPL 2.1" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1" >> >> DEPENDS = "bzip2 zlib python perl db openssl elfutils expat libpcre attr acl >> popt" >> -PR = "r13" >> +PR = "r14" >> >> # rpm2cpio is a shell script, which is part of the rpm src.rpm. It is needed >> # in order to extract the distribution SRPM into a format we can extract... >> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ SRC_URI = >> "http://www.rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/rpm-5.4.0-0.20101229.src.rpm;ex >> file://rpm-showrc.patch \ >> file://rpm-nofsync.patch \ >> file://rpm-solvedb.patch \ >> + file://rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch \ >> " >> >> # file://hdraddorappend.patch \ >> -- >> 1.7.4.1 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org >> Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org > > ______________________________________________________________________ > RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org > Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org ______________________________________________________________________ RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
