On 10/26/2012 12:56 PM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
Hi,

Please find the corrected patch in the attachment.
I really spend quite some time fighting indentation :( , but let's hope it
succeeded now (I am not that sure since it so much changing when I open it
with different editors/settings).
I was trying to use only soft tabs: 4 spaces, but in places where I had to
integrated in existing code it behaves unpredictable because of hard tabs
that I think in some places aren't of same size (but maybe this is my
inability to use editors).

It's much better now, thanks. There are a couple of misindentations still but I can just as well tweak those while applying, and its not as if the whole codebase is perfectly indented, I just want new things to land in a shape that doesn't need immediate whitespace "fixes" as they mask away real changes from eg "git blame". I dunno what editor(s) you use, vi(m) is what I live and breath by - for sure its arcane but at least it doesn't mess with the formatting you choose :) The only setting I have wrt C in ~/.vimrc is "autocmd BufRead,BufNewFile *.[chi] set sw=4"

Apart from indentation-trivia, there's just one issue that I see:

+    if (!plugins || rstreq(plugins, "")) {
+ rpmlog(RPMLOG_INFO, _("Failed to expand %%__transaction_plugins macro\n"));
+           return rc;
+    }

This still causes superfluous/bogus messages to be emitted on what I consider to be the default case of no plugins being configured. I'd rather just remove the rpmlog() line from there for now, or at least change it to RPMLOG_DEBUG so it wont show up on regular uses like 'rpm -Uvh'.

If you dont mind me doing a couple of indentation fixes and the rpmlog() change, I'll just go ahead and commit it with those tweaks. FWIW I'm just about to branch off for rpm-4.11 (sooner than I originally planned but...), the plugin changes will at least initially go to master only to give us time and freedom to fiddle with the details.

        - Panu -

_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to