> I don't think it makes sense to have a revoked key in the database at all, 
> you might as well just delete the key from the database. So we could state 
> that it's up to the layer above rpm that manages the keys to handle this 
> (libzypp does handle key updates, I don't know about dnf).

Perhaps a better option would be to replace the revoked key with an invalid 
stub entry, so future attempts to re-add the key fail.  This also lets us 
provide better error messages to the user.

> But I do think rpm should check the expiry date of a key. We could make it 
> configurable how rpm deals with an expired key.

Agreed.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1598#issuecomment-872999190
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to