In librepo we prepare implementation without GPGme 
(https://github.com/rpm-software-management/librepo/pull/275). I would prefer 
to  require rpm with rpm-sequoia back-end when librepo will use RPM instead of 
GPGME. It will ensure that we will use the tested backend and if someone will 
need to rpm without rpm-sequoia then they will also need to rebuild librepo.

May I ask you to ship rpm or rpm-libs with a provide that signals rpm with 
sequoia back-end?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2556
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to