I too quite severely dislike the notion of librpm users caring about the
backend (name) explicitly. Ideally an API user would be handled -ENOTIMPL which
they could then handle the best they see fit, but we don't have such interfaces
at the moment and again would loathe to do new developments for a thing that's
on its way out.
So maybe we'll just add an internal API for the purposes of identifying itself
in --showrc, but leave it out of the public API. And just handle the
dnf/librepo case in packaging instead, that much is easy to do.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2556#issuecomment-1770521066
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2556/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
