My apology. I see other options. In past we faced a problem with librepo and
zchunk where library was build without zchunk support (RHEL) but libdnf with
support (copr). We resolved it by `#define LRO_SUPPORTS_CACHEDIR` in librepo.
Then libdnf was able to detect whether librepo supports it or not. If rpm
define such a variable we could provide a message that something is not
available with a reason or fail nicely with a suggestion. The define will
resolve the biggest issue - something behaves incorrectly and we have no idea
why because we don't see any clue about back-end used in RPM.
You also suggested the option using modification of rpm.pc. I think this could
resolve the build requirement part.
Or the request could be converted into FEDORA, RHEL downstream request.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2556#issuecomment-1611034479
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2556/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
