I think proposal 2 is more extensible. With proposal 1 we assume that no policy
except clamping would be wanted, but people are clearly interested in other
approaches. So I'd go with 2., even if initially there are no plans to provide
non-clamping choices.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2944#issuecomment-2015543625
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2944/c2015543...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
