https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2819
--- Comment #10 from Juha Tuomala <[email protected]> 2013-06-04 14:46:22 CEST --- (In reply to comment #9) > I could rename the binaries so that they have a common prefix, like for > example > "oc-". Do you think it would be better? We discussed that with sg_utils case in Fedora and I got told that it should not be done, upstream decides those names. I'd say that I go for it, this is nof Fedora and it would make things more usable. > This is the first of a series of packages I use regularly to manipulate MPEG2 > streams on Fedora and are not available on rpmfusion. I would definately use this. But I would need some parts more, to make it complete service for multicasting video service in LAN for xbmc-terminals. I've feeling that it doesn't have those pieces. Maybe someone have hacked up something to fill that gap? I'm not completely sure what else would be needed, it probably depends on - is the video source my security camera, H.264 iptv-stream from ISP or DVD-ripped movie in my video-collection. Probably there should/is some control-connection to switch sources. 1gig lan probably could easily carry all video cameras and streaming tv at same time, but video-collection case it doesn't make sense as it's recorded media and would need opened video-on-demand-basis. Maybe these bits and pieces could fit into picture? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Session_Description_Protocol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_discovery_protocol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPnP_AV_media_server#Media_server does OC provide any of that functionality? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
