On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 6:24 PM Gary Buhrmaster via rpmfusion-developers < [email protected]> wrote:
> I have this (very) old memory that changing from arch'ed > packages to noarch (or vice versa) did not always work > correctly (without epoch'izing?). That may have been well > over a decade ago with yum, so it might no longer be > relevant (and as the steam package, as I recall, is mostly > just installing a script that downloads the full payload, it > probably does not matter, as it never installed files into > isa dependent locations). > The issue is only with switching architectures (ex. trying to go from i686 to x86_64) but not going to noarch or going away from it. So the upgrade in this case is successful. > However, since the current requirements can only be > satisfied on certain platforms today, should the spec file > not include ExclusiveArch modifiers today (which can > be adjusted if/when those other enhancements are > enabled by valve?) I will make a test, it would mean for now to have both of these: BuildArch noarch ExclusiveArch x86_64 i686 Which I'm not sure it's going to work. Probably it would be easier to just gate the noarch package for x86_64 only in the RPMFusion repositories. --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/
_______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
