Le ven. 22 mai 2026 à 12:37, Simone Caronni <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 11:08 AM Nicolas Chauvet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That can be the way forward (should work with koji/mash), especially >> when the aarch64 arch will be added. >> >> That said noarch means the package will be the same with all >> architectures, so you aren't supposed to emit any arched dependency >> from noarch package. >> It currently works in x86 context because x86_64 can satisfy the >> (x86-32) %{_isa} dependency, but it won't work when aarch64 will be >> introduced. > > >> >> The only issue I know related to arch package migration is that >> sub-packages for noarch packages cannot be arched, >> while arched packages can have noarch sub-packages. > > > Staying on noarch should allow us to have the single package The current situation is broken, as I said, a noarch package cannot have arched dependencies. Having a noarch package doesn't fix any issue. Please fix. _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Re: Steam package becoming noarch
Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers Fri, 22 May 2026 04:29:30 -0700
- Fwd: Steam package becoming noarc... Simone Caronni via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Fwd: Steam package becom... Chris Adams via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Fwd: Steam package b... Simone Caronni via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Fwd: Steam packa... Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Fwd: Steam packa... Chris Adams via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Steam package becoming n... Gary Buhrmaster via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Steam package becomi... Simone Caronni via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Steam package be... Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Steam packag... Simone Caronni via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Steam p... Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers
- Re: Ste... Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
