Le ven. 22 mai 2026 à 12:37, Simone Caronni <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 11:08 AM Nicolas Chauvet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> That can be the way forward (should work with koji/mash), especially
>> when the aarch64 arch will be added.
>>
>> That said noarch means the package will be the same with all
>> architectures, so you aren't supposed to emit any arched dependency
>> from noarch package.
>> It currently works in x86 context because x86_64 can satisfy the
>> (x86-32) %{_isa} dependency, but it won't work when aarch64 will be
>> introduced.
>
>
>>
>> The only issue I know related to arch package migration is that
>> sub-packages for noarch packages cannot be arched,
>> while arched packages can have noarch sub-packages.
>
>
> Staying on noarch should allow us to have the single package
The current situation is broken, as I said, a noarch package cannot
have arched dependencies.
Having a noarch package doesn't fix any issue.
Please fix.
_______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to