Hi, On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Most of them are already rrdc_*. I don't see a reason to s/^rrdc/rrdcd/. > > sure, rrdc_* is fine too
I used the `rrdc_' prefix for all exported functions which connect to the server. The `c' was meant as apprevation for `client'. I have to admit I don't quite see the need for introducing a different prefix. What problem is that supposed to solve? As for `rrd_cmd_flush': I used that name, because there already was a function called `rrd_flush' that was exported. Dropping that old function and changing the new function's name is, in my opinion, not a good move and will create problems. Regards, -octo -- Florian octo Forster Hacker in training GnuPG: 0x91523C3D http://verplant.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list rrd-developers@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
