On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:15:02PM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > yes dropping rrd_flush from the api is not a good idea, otoh it > does not acomplish anything sensible in the code, so I propose the > following: > > have rrdc_flush for the client flushing function > and turn rrd_flush into a no-op for backward compatibility
+1 -- kevin brintnall =~ /kbr...@rufus.net/ _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list rrd-developers@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
